| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This hopefully resolves https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/382.
|
|
This has to be since the mounts are reloaded
each time a mount is added. In case of two
mounts mounting at the same time there will
be a race condition for applying policy.
Signed-off-by: NymanRobin <robin.nyman@est.tech>
|
|
Probably resolves https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/382
|
|
|
|
The latest version of gofmt flattens the nested lists in comments in
crypto.go and filesystem.go. According to
https://go.dev/doc/comment#mistakes, "Go doc comments do not support
nested lists". However, that page also mentions that a workaround is to
use different list markers for each level. Do that.
|
|
Since Go 1.16 (which recently became the minimum supported Go version
for this project), the package io/ioutil is deprecated in favor of
equivalent functionality in the io and os packages. staticcheck warns
about this. Address all the warnings by switching to the non-deprecated
replacement functions.
|
|
Upgrade dependencies to latest version
|
|
github.com/golang/protobuf/proto has been deprecated in favor of
google.golang.org/protobuf/proto, so migrate to the non-deprecated one.
|
|
|
|
Currently, fscrypt policies and protectors are world readable, as they
are created with mode 0644. While this can be nice for use cases where
users share these files, those use cases seem to be quite rare, and it's
not a great default security-wise since it exposes password hashes to
all users. While fscrypt uses a very strong password hash algorithm, it
would still be best to follow the lead of /etc/shadow and keep this
information non-world-readable.
Therefore, start creating these files with mode 0600.
Of course, if users do actually want to share these files, they have the
option of simply chmod'ing them to a less restrictive mode. An option
could also be added to make fscrypt use the old mode 0644; however, the
need for that is currently unclear.
|
|
Since fscrypt replaces metadata files rather than overwrites them (to
get atomicity), their owner will change to root if root makes a change.
That isn't too much of an issue when the files have mode 0644. However,
it will become a much bigger issue when the files have mode 0600,
especially because existing files with mode 0644 would also get changed
to have mode 0600.
In preparation for this, start preserving the previous owner and mode of
policy and protector files when they are updated.
|
|
Since commit 4c7c6631cc5a ("Set owner of login protectors to correct
user"), login protectors are made owned by the user when root creates
one on a user's behalf. That's good, but the same isn't true of other
files that get created at the same time:
- The policy protecting the directory
- The protector link file, if the policy is on a different filesystem
- The recovery protector, if the policy is on a different filesystem
- The recovery instructions file
In preparation for setting all metadata files to mode 0600, start making
all these files owned by the user in this scenario as well.
|
|
A previous commit extended file ownership validation to policy and
protector files (by default -- there's an opt-out in /etc/fscrypt.conf).
However, that didn't apply to the parent directories:
MOUNTPOINT
MOUNTPOINT/.fscrypt
MOUNTPOINT/.fscrypt/policies
MOUNTPOINT/.fscrypt/protectors
The problem is that if the parent directories aren't trusted (owned by
another non-root user), then untrusted changes to their contents can be
made at any time, including the introduction of symlinks and so on.
While it's debatable how much of a problem this really is, given the
other validations that are done, it seems to be appropriate to validate
the parent directories too.
Therefore, this commit applies the same ownership validations to the
above four directories as are done on the metadata files themselves.
In addition, it is validated that none of these directories are symlinks
except for ".fscrypt" where this is explicitly supported.
|
|
The metadata validation checks introduced by the previous commits are
good, but to reduce the attack surface it would be much better to avoid
reading and parsing files owned by other users in the first place.
There are some possible use cases for users sharing fscrypt metadata
files, but I think that for the vast majority of users it is unneeded
and just opens up attack surface. Thus, make fscrypt (and pam_fscrypt)
not process policies or protectors owned by other users by default.
Specifically,
* If fscrypt or pam_fscrypt is running as a non-root user, only
policies and protectors owned by the user or by root can be used.
* If fscrypt is running as root, any policy or protector can be used.
(This is to match user expectations -- starting a sudo session
should gain rights, not remove rights.)
* If pam_fscrypt is running as root, only policies and protectors
owned by root can be used. Note that this only applies when the
root user themselves has an fscrypt login protector, which is rare.
Add an option 'allow_cross_user_metadata' to /etc/fscrypt.conf which
allows restoring the old behavior for anyone who really needs it.
|
|
World-writable directories are not appropriate for some systems, so
offer a choice of single-user-writable and world-writable modes, with
single-user-writable being the default. Add a new documentation section
to help users decide which one to use.
|
|
To allow users to update fscrypt metadata they own in
single-user-writable metadata directories (introduced by the next
commit), fall back to non-atomic overwrites when atomic ones can't be
done due to not having write access to the directory.
|
|
If a login protector contains a UID that differs from the file owner
(and the file owner is not root), it might be a spoofed file that was
created maliciously, so make sure to consider such files to be invalid.
|
|
Don't allow reading metadata files that are very large, as they can
crash the program due to the memory required. Similarly, don't allow
reading metadata files that aren't regular files, such as FIFOs, or
symlinks (which could point to a device node like /dev/zero), as that
can hang the program. Both issues were particularly problematic for
pam_fscrypt, as they could prevent users from being able to log in.
Note: these checks are arguably unneeded if we strictly check the file
ownership too, which a later commit will do. But there's no reason not
to do these basic checks too.
|
|
Following the example of /proc/self/mountinfo, replace the space,
newline, tab, and backslash characters with octal escape sequences so
that the output can be parsed unambiguously.
|
|
|
|
This is needed to allow creating protector links to btrfs filesystems.
Update https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/339
|
|
This is needed to make FindMount() work on btrfs filesystems.
Update https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/339
|
|
Restore the canonicalizePath() function from before commit
f2eb79fb5fb10275c014b55c13e28ff02d3b70a8, since it's needed again.
Update https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/339
|
|
Add back the mountsByPath map, which indexes all Mounts by mountpoint.
This is needed again.
To avoid confusion, also rename two local variables named mountsByPath.
mountsByPath won't contain nil entries, so also make AllFilesystems()
use it instead of mountsByDevice. This shouldn't change its behavior.
Update https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/339
|
|
Currently, linked protectors use filesystem link files of the form
"UUID=<uuid>". These links get broken if the filesystem's UUID changes,
e.g. due to the filesystem being re-created even if the ".fscrypt"
directory is backed up and restored.
To prevent links from being broken (in most cases), start storing the
mountpoint path in the link files too, in the form
"UUID=<uuid>\nPATH=<path>\n". When following a link, try the UUID
first, and if it doesn't work try the PATH. While it's possible that
the path changed too, for login protectors (the usual use case of linked
protectors) this won't be an issue as the path will always be "/".
An alternative solution would be to fall back to scanning all
filesystems for the needed protector descriptor. I decided not to do
that, since relying on a global scan doesn't seem to be a good design.
It wouldn't scale to large numbers of filesystems, it could cross
security boundaries, and it would make it possible for adding a new
filesystem to break fscrypt on existing filesystems. And if a global
scan was an acceptable way to find protectors during normal use, then
there would be no need for link files in the first place.
Note: this change is backwards compatible (i.e., fscrypt will continue
to recognize old link files) but not forwards-compatible (i.e., previous
versions of fscrypt won't recognize new link files).
Fixes https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/311
|
|
Forbid 'fscrypt setup' on filesystems that aren't expected to support
encryption (other than the root filesystem), and skip looking for
fscrypt metadata directories on such filesystems. This has two
benefits. First, it avoids the printing of annoying warnings like:
pam_fscrypt[75038]: stat /run/user/0/.fscrypt: permission denied
pam_fscrypt[75038]: stat /run/user/0/.fscrypt/policies: permission denied
pam_fscrypt[75038]: stat /run/user/0/.fscrypt/protectors: permission denied
pam_fscrypt[75038]: stat /sys/firmware/efi/efivars/.fscrypt: invalid argument
pam_fscrypt[75038]: stat /sys/firmware/efi/efivars/.fscrypt/policies: invalid argument
pam_fscrypt[75038]: stat /sys/firmware/efi/efivars/.fscrypt/protectors: invalid argument
pam_fscrypt[75038]: stat /sys/fs/pstore/.fscrypt: permission denied
pam_fscrypt[75038]: stat /sys/fs/pstore/.fscrypt/policies: permission denied
pam_fscrypt[75038]: stat /sys/fs/pstore/.fscrypt/protectors: permission denied
Second, it avoids long delays or side effects on some filesystems.
To do this, introduce an allowlist of filesystem types that fscrypt will
recognize. I wanted to avoid doing this, since this list will need to
be updated in the future, but I don't see a better solution.
|
|
When the root user creates a login protector for a non-root user, make
sure to chown() the protector file to make it owned by the user.
Without this, the protector cannot be updated by the user, which causes
it to get out of sync if the user changes their login passphrase.
Fixes https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/319
|
|
Root can read all files, so this test fails when running as root.
Skip it instead.
Resolves https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/288
|
|
Introduce filesystem.ErrEncryptionNotEnabled and
filesystem.ErrEncryptionNotSupported which include the Mount as context,
and translate the corresponding metadata/ errors into them. Then make
these errors show much better suggestions.
Also replace lots of other filesystem/ errors with either custom types
or with unnamed one-off errors that include more context. Fix backwards
wrapping in lots of cases.
Finally, don't include the mountpoint in places where it's not useful,
like OS-level errors that already include the path.
|
|
ErrMissingPolicyMetadata:
Include the mount, directory path, and metadata path. Also move
the explanation into actions/ since it doesn't refer to any CLI
command.
ErrPolicyMetadataMismatch:
Include a lot more information. Also start checking for
consistency of the policy key descriptors, not just the
encryption options. Add a test for this.
ErrDifferentFilesystem:
Include the mountpoints.
ErrOnlyProtector:
Clarify the message and include the protector descriptor.
ErrAlreadyProtected:
ErrNotProtected:
Include the policy and protector descriptors.
ErrAccessDeniedPossiblyV2:
Make it slightly clearer what failed. Also move the explanation
into actions/ since it doesn't refer to any CLI command.
|
|
Allow setting FSCRYPT_CONSISTENT_OUTPUT=1 in the environment to cause
policies and protectors to sorted by last modification time. The CLI
tests need this to make the output of 'fscrypt' ordered in a consistent
way with regard to the operations performed.
|
|
Update the /proc/self/mountinfo parsing code to allow selecting a Mount
with Subtree != "/", i.e. a Mount not of the full filesystem. This is
needed to allow fscrypt to work in containers, where the root of the
filesystem may not be mounted.
See findMainMount() for details about the algorithm used.
Resolves https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/211
|
|
If trying to unlock a v2-encrypted directory fails because the kernel
lacks support for v2 policies, show a better error message. This can
happen if someone downgrades their kernel or tries to access encrypted
directories on removable storage from a computer with an older kernel.
Detecting this case is difficult since all we have to go with is EACCES
when opening the directory. Implement a heuristic where if get EACCES,
we actually have read access to the directory, and the kernel doesn't
support v2 policies, we show the improved error message.
Before:
# fscrypt unlock dir
[ERROR] fscrypt unlock: open dir: permission denied
After:
# fscrypt unlock dir
[ERROR] fscrypt unlock: open dir: permission denied
This may be caused by the directory using a v2 encryption policy and
the current kernel not supporting it. If indeed the case, then this
directory can only be used on kernel v5.4 and later. You can create
directories accessible on older kernels by changing policy_version to
1 in /etc/fscrypt.conf.
|
|
When adding a protector to a policy, don't unconditionally overwrite the
protector link, because it may already exist. Instead, if it already
exists and points to the mount, just use it. If it already exists and
points to the wrong place, return an error.
Also add a bool to the return value of AddLinkedProtector() so that
callers can check whether the link was newly created or not.
|
|
canonicalizePath() is now only used by an error path in
getMountFromLink(), which we can make use getDeviceName() instead.
|
|
To make manually editing linked protectors slightly more user-friendly,
automatically strip any leading or trailing whitespace. E.g. treat
"UUID=3a6d9a76-47f0-4f13-81bf-3332fbe984fb\n" the same as
"UUID=3a6d9a76-47f0-4f13-81bf-3332fbe984fb".
Update https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/115
|
|
Add a version of loadMountInfo() that takes an io.Reader parameter to
allow injecting a custom mountinfo file, then add some unit tests.
|
|
Currently, fscrypt treats bind mounts as separate filesystems. This is
broken because fscrypt will look for a directory's encryption policy in
different places depending on which mount it's accessed through. This
forces users to create an fscrypt metadata directory at every bind
mount, and to copy fscrypt metadata around between mounts.
Fix this by storing fscrypt metadata only at the root of the filesystem.
To accomplish this:
- Make mountsByDevice store only a single Mount per filesystem, rather
than multiple. For this Mount, choose a mount of the full filesystem
if available, preferably a read-write mount. If the filesystem has
only bind mounts, store a nil entry in mountsByDevice so we can show a
proper error message later.
- Change FindMount() and GetMount() to look up the Mount by device
number rather than by path, so that they don't return different Mounts
depending on which path is used.
- Change AllFilesystems() to not return bind mounts.
- Due to the above changes, the mountsByPath map is no longer needed
outside of loadMountInfo(). So make it a local variable there.
Resolves https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/59
|
|
The previous patch fixed making linked protectors to /dev/root, by
setting Mount.Device to the real device node rather than /dev/root.
That's good, but it also hints that the linked protector handling is
unnecessarily fragile, as it relies on the device node name matching
exactly. The Linux kernel allows the same device to have multiple
device nodes, and path comparisons are slow and error-prone in general.
Change it to compare the device number instead.
|
|
A root filesystem mounted via the kernel command line always has a
source of "/dev/root", which isn't a real device node. This makes
fscrypt think this filesystem doesn't have a source device, which breaks
creating login passphrase-protected directories on other filesystems:
fscrypt encrypt: filesystem /: no device for mount "/": system error: cannot create filesystem link
This also makes 'fscrypt status' show a blank source device:
MOUNTPOINT DEVICE FILESYSTEM ENCRYPTION FSCRYPT
/ ext4 supported Yes
To fix this case, update loadMountInfo() to map the device number to the
device name via sysfs rather than use the mount source field.
|
|
Add a utility type and functions for handling device numbers.
|
|
The kernel always shows mountpoints as absolute paths without symlinks,
so there's no need to canonicalize them in userspace.
|
|
Change loadMountInfo() to load the mounts directly from
/proc/self/mountinfo, rather than use the mntent.h C library calls.
This is needed for correct handling of bind mounts and of "/dev/root",
since /proc/self/mountinfo has extra fields which show the mounted
subtree and the filesystem's device number. /proc/mounts lacks these
fields, and the C library calls can't provide them.
To start, this patch just switches to using /proc/self/mountinfo,
without doing anything with the extra fields yet.
As a bonus, this eliminates all C code in mountpoint.go.
|
|
Make it clearer that this function loads data into global data
structures, and doesn't return anything.
|
|
fscrypt doesn't currently do anything with the mount options, so remove
them from the Mount structure for now.
|
|
Make it clear that this refers to a type of filesystem such as "ext4",
rather than to a specific filesystem instance.
|
|
Simple optimization to reduce memory allocations and copying when appending.
|
|
If the user has set a restrictive umask, e.g. 0077, then
/etc/fscrypt.conf would be created without the world-readable bit set.
Fix it by overriding the umask when creating the file.
Resolves https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/151
|
|
This makes it easier to understand which code is actually invoked by the
command-line tool.
|
|
Support the case where the user has a read-only root filesystem (e.g.
with OSTree) and had previously created a symlink /.fscrypt pointing to
a writable location, so that login protectors can be created there.
Resolves https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/131
|
