<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>fscrypt.git/cli-tests/t_encrypt_login.sh, branch sshd-bug-workaround</title>
<subtitle>Go tool for managing Linux filesystem encryption
</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.hodgden.net/cgit.cgi/fscrypt.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>Set owner of login protectors to correct user</title>
<updated>2021-12-20T03:44:59+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Eric Biggers</name>
<email>ebiggers@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2021-12-20T03:19:25+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.hodgden.net/cgit.cgi/fscrypt.git/commit/?id=4c7c6631cc5a27cc6b4431f5ad3805a2d624c5f5'/>
<id>4c7c6631cc5a27cc6b4431f5ad3805a2d624c5f5</id>
<content type='text'>
When the root user creates a login protector for a non-root user, make
sure to chown() the protector file to make it owned by the user.
Without this, the protector cannot be updated by the user, which causes
it to get out of sync if the user changes their login passphrase.

Fixes https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/319
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
When the root user creates a login protector for a non-root user, make
sure to chown() the protector file to make it owned by the user.
Without this, the protector cannot be updated by the user, which causes
it to get out of sync if the user changes their login passphrase.

Fixes https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/319
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Adjust recovery passphrase generation</title>
<updated>2021-10-05T22:30:30+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Eric Biggers</name>
<email>ebiggers@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2021-09-14T21:12:39+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.hodgden.net/cgit.cgi/fscrypt.git/commit/?id=7fed63a84963cbd790e86a0e59ff14724bcf33c4'/>
<id>7fed63a84963cbd790e86a0e59ff14724bcf33c4</id>
<content type='text'>
As per the feedback at https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/115
where users didn't understand that the recovery passphrase is important,
restore the original behavior where recovery passphrase generation
happens automatically without a prompt.  This applies to the case where
'fscrypt encrypt' is using a login protector on a non-root filesystem.

However, leave the --no-recovery option so that the recovery passphrase
can still be disabled if the user really wants to.  Also, clarify the
information provided about the recovery passphrase.

Update https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/115
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
As per the feedback at https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/115
where users didn't understand that the recovery passphrase is important,
restore the original behavior where recovery passphrase generation
happens automatically without a prompt.  This applies to the case where
'fscrypt encrypt' is using a login protector on a non-root filesystem.

However, leave the --no-recovery option so that the recovery passphrase
can still be disabled if the user really wants to.  Also, clarify the
information provided about the recovery passphrase.

Update https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/115
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>cli-tests: add t_encrypt_login</title>
<updated>2020-05-09T21:04:47+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Eric Biggers</name>
<email>ebiggers@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-05-09T21:04:47+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.hodgden.net/cgit.cgi/fscrypt.git/commit/?id=280c466cff982ff536016cc35cc135dd439782a4'/>
<id>280c466cff982ff536016cc35cc135dd439782a4</id>
<content type='text'>
Test encrypting a directory using a login (pam_passphrase) protector.
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Test encrypting a directory using a login (pam_passphrase) protector.
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
